In re Takacs

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Takacs

829 A.2d 664

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 4, 2003·No. No. 174 Disciplinary Docket No. 3·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of June, 2003, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated April 4, 2003, the Petition for Reinstatement is GRANTED.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of June, 2003, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated April 4, 2003, the Petition for Reinstatement is GRANTED.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

In re Takacs, 829 A.2d 664 (Pa. 2003).

Pincite

829 A.2d 664 (In re Takacs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.