In re Taintor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Taintor

15 A.D.2d 756, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11503

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 15 A.D.2d 756 (In re Taintor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Taintor, 15 A.D.2d 756, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11503 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted only insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten or mimeographed record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, upon condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record and one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points on the attorney for respondent and files 6 typewritten copies or 19 mimeographed copies of both the record on appeal and appellant’s points with this court on or before April 3, 1962, with notice of argument for the May 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to he argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted only insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten or mimeographed record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, upon condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record and one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points on the attorney for respondent and files 6 typewritten copies or 19 mimeographed copies of both the record on appeal and appellant’s points with this court on or before April 3, 1962, with notice of argument for the May 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to he argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 A.D.2d 756, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-taintor-nyappdiv-1962.