In re Tahoe Resources, Inc.

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 8 9 Case No. 2:17-cv-01868-RFB-NJK IN RE: TAHOE RESOURCES, INC. Order [Docket Nos. 197, 199, 202, 205, 208, 211, 1] and 214] 12 On October 5, 2022, Plaintiff filed seven motions to seal related to requests for issuance of 13} letters rogatory. Docket Nos. 197, 199, 202, 205, 208, 211, 214.' All of these motions were filed on the basis that Defendants or non-party Business for Social Responsibility designated certain 15] materials as confidential. See Docket No. 197 at 2-3; Docket No. 199 at 2-3; Docket No. 202 at 16] 2-3; Docket No. 205 at 2-3; Docket No. 208 at 2-3; Docket No. 211 at 2-3; Docket No. 214 at 2- 17] 3. Such designations have now been withdrawn. See Docket No. 220 at 2-3. Accordingly, the 18] motions to seal are DENIED. 20 Dated: October 31, 2022 21 J) as — Nancy J. Koppe 22 United States Magistrate Judge 23 24 25 26 27 ' The fact that a sealing request may be unopposed does not automatically result in it being granted because the Court is tasked with protecting the public’s interest in transparency. Allegiant 28] Travel Co. v. Kinzer, 2022 WL 2819734, at *1 n.I (D. Nev. July 19, 2022).