In re Tabitha R.
225 A.D.2d 1049, 639 N.Y.2d 221, 639 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2877
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 8, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Memorandum: Intervenor has appealed from an order denying her petition for an extension of foster care placement. Because the period of the requested extension has expired, this matter is moot (see, Matter of Darby C., 175 AD2d 959, lv denied 78 NY2d 862). Intervenor has not demonstrated an exception to the mootness doctrine (see, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 713-715). (Appeal from Order of Oswego County Family Court, Roman, J. — Extend Placement.) Present — Green, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Tabitha R., 225 A.D.2d 1049, 639 N.Y.2d 221, 639 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 1049 (In re Tabitha R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Kevin R.
251 A.D.2d 1022 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
In re Jerry XX.
243 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)