In re Tabitha R.

225 A.D.2d 1049, 639 N.Y.2d 221, 639 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2877
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 8, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 225 A.D.2d 1049 (In re Tabitha R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Tabitha R., 225 A.D.2d 1049, 639 N.Y.2d 221, 639 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Memorandum: Intervenor has appealed from an order denying her petition for an extension of foster care placement. Because the period of the requested extension has expired, this matter is moot (see, Matter of Darby C., 175 AD2d 959, lv denied 78 NY2d 862). Intervenor has not demonstrated an exception to the mootness doctrine (see, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 713-715). (Appeal from Order of Oswego County Family Court, Roman, J. — Extend Placement.) Present — Green, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Kevin R.
251 A.D.2d 1022 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
In re Jerry XX.
243 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 A.D.2d 1049, 639 N.Y.2d 221, 639 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tabitha-r-nyappdiv-1996.