In Re Swiger, Unpublished Decision (2006)

2006 Ohio 6253
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 22, 2006
DocketNo. CT2006-0007
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2006 Ohio 6253 (In Re Swiger, Unpublished Decision (2006)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Swiger, Unpublished Decision (2006), 2006 Ohio 6253 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

OPINION

JUDGMENT: Affirmed {¶ 1} Appellant Rebecca Achauer ("mother") appeals the August 5, 2005 Judgment Entry, and the January 9, 2006 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law entered by the Muskingum County Court of Common Pleas, Juenile Division, which granted custody of her minor child to appellee Terry Swiger ("father").

STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS
{¶ 2} On March 8, 2005, Muskingum County Children Services ("MCCS") filed a Complaint in the Muskingum County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, alleging Jeremy Swiger (DOB 3/22/99) was an abused and dependent child, and seeking temporary custody of the boy. Via Shelter Care Hearing Decision filed March 9, 2005, the trial court placed Jeremy in the interim protected supervision of MCCS, and ordered mother not to remove the boy from Muskingum County until further order of the court.

{¶ 3} On March 23, 2005, father filed a Motion for Custody, requesting the trial court grant him legal custody of Jeremy. The parties filed a time waiver relative to the dispositional hearing, which was filed on April 5, 2005. MCCS filed a case plan, which the trial court approved and adopted on April 21, 2005.

{¶ 4} The matter came on for an adjudicatory/dispositional hearing on July 20, 2005. The following evidence was adduced at the hearing.

{¶ 5} Jennifer Myers, a case worker with MCCS, testified as to mother's history with Guernsey County Children Services and MCCS. In 2001, Guernsey County Children Services investigated allegations of physical abuse and neglect by mother against Jeremy. As the allegations were substantiated, Guernsey County worked to provide mother with the necessary services, recommending Jeremy attend speech and hearing therapy. Guernsey County also had concerns about mother's physical violence toward father on several occasions.

{¶ 6} In January, 2003, MCCS received several reports and conducted investigations into physical abuse of Jeremy by mother. MCCS also had concerns about domestic violence in the home. MCCS was unable to substantiate the allegations, but encouraged mother to obtain speech and hearing therapy for Jeremy. In July, 2003, MCCS received another allegation of physical abuse and domestic violence. Although MCCS recommended speech therapy for Jeremy, mother failed to follow through with this recommendation. In May, 2004, MCCS investigated a report of domestic violence between mother and Andy Achauer, mother's live-in paramour. MCCS became increasingly concerned about mother's verbal abuse of Jeremy, mother's taking her anger out on the child, and mother's emotional maltreatment of him. Mother also left five year old Jeremy alone in her home with her dog.

{¶ 7} Because of the ongoing allegations and reports, MCCS opened a case for intervention services in September, 2004. MCCS workers found Jeremy to be developmentally delayed and in need of mental health services. MCCS requested mother receive psychological services due to her assaultive behaviors and anger outbursts. MCCS also recommended parenting classes, in an effort to lessen mother's domestic violence. While the September, 2004 case was open, mother had been convicted of domestic violence against Andy Achauer. Achauer's children, Cory and Cody, reported mother screamed at Jeremy on a daily basis, and they had observed her kicking the child. Jeremy's teacher reported the child's behavior had escalated, including an incident where Jeremy hit a pregnant teacher. As a result of these ongoing reports, MCCS filed the Complaint for Dependency and Neglect in March, 2005. Myers further testified as to mother's failure to follow through and/or comply with the case plan objectives. Myers further commented father had addressed all of MCCS's concerns and successfully completed his case plan. Myers noted she had no concerns father would not comply with the recommended therapy for Jeremy. She recommended placement of Jeremy with father, but with MCCS retaining protective supervision.

{¶ 8} Dr. Howard Beazel, who conducted the psychological evaluation of mother, testified, after reviewing her records, interviewing her on three occasions, and conducting psychological testing, he found mother to have a significant to severe personality disorder. He added mother has very poor impulse control and becomes easily angry and hostile, but soon after an episode rationalizes and minimizes it. Dr. Beazel recalled mother brought Jeremy with her to her second appointment. Dr. Beazel found Jeremy to be essentially nonverbal. On three different occasions in front of Dr. Beazel, mother slapped Jeremy for no apparent reason. Dr. Beazel did not find mother truthful, noting numerous instances in which her recollection of an event was markedly different from other reports of the same event. For instance, mother explained her recent domestic violence conviction was based upon her slapping Achauer in the face, however, the police records indicated he was bloodied and bruised and beaten up by mother.

{¶ 9} With respect to Jeremy, Dr. Beazel explained, whenever he has seen a child of his age who is nonverbal, ninety-nine plus percent of the time such condition is due to mental retardation or autism. Dr. Beazel was left without a clear psychological explanation for why Jeremy does not talk. However, based upon the records, he believed mother's mistreatment of the boy is the most likely explanation for this. Dr. Beazel added Jeremy's receptive language skills appear to be age appropriate and consistent with at least an average IQ. Dr. Beazel concluded, based upon mother's history of instability, violence, and aggression, Jeremy will be at risk for neglect and abuse if he remains in her custody.

{¶ 10} Andy Achauer, mother's paramour, testified he has been involved with mother for three and a half years. Mother and Jeremy live with Achauer in his home. He described their relationship as "very rocky". Mother is aggressive and angry. Achauer noted there are few peaceful days in the home, and screaming and yelling are typical occurrences. Mother does not care if the children are in or out of the house.1 Achauer stated something one or all of the children did is usually what precipates mother's outbursts. Achauer recalled the day mother attacked him at his place of business because he did not wait for her to go to lunch. As a result, mother was convicted of domestic violence. Achauer explained he has applied for civil protection orders on a couple of different occasions, but usually ends up dropping the issue because he feels guilty about pushing out mother. He stated he has asked mother to leave his residence and wants her to leave, however, allows her to stay is because he feels guilty about kicking out her and Jeremy.

{¶ 11} Achauer testified mother yells at Jeremy and he has seen her push the child, but noted mother "doesn't beat on him". Tr. at 309. He added mother was constantly lying to him. When asked if mother acts appropriately with his children and if he had any concerns about her interaction with them, Achauer replied, "Yes". Achauer described how mother is physically aggressive with Lindsey, his six year old. He stated a lot of the times, the children are not misbehaving, but something sparks mother and she goes off.

{¶ 12} Renee Achauer, Andy's ex-wife, testified she and mother have a contentious relationship, and the two have been involved in a couple of physical altercations. Mother has made a multitude of harassing phone calls to Renee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re D.R., Unpublished Decision (1-30-2006)
2006 Ohio 340 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)
Blakemore v. Blakemore
450 N.E.2d 1140 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2006 Ohio 6253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-swiger-unpublished-decision-2006-ohioctapp-2006.