In re Swift

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Swift

148 So. 3d 927, 2014 La. LEXIS 2138, 2014 WL 4957976

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 3, 2014

DocketNo. 2014-B-1756

StatusPublished

This text of 148 So. 3d 927 (In re Swift) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Swift, 148 So. 3d 927, 2014 La. LEXIS 2138, 2014 WL 4957976 (La. 2014).

Pincite

Opinions

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

hThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent filed a frivolous lawsuit, engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, and threatened to bring disciplinary charges against an attorney solely to obtain an advantage in a civil matter. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Rickey K. Swift, Louisiana Bar Roll number 17382, be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall be placed on unsupervised probation for a period of one year.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that ah costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

HUGHES, J., concurs and assigns reasons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI