In re Sweet
This text of 23 F. Cas. 543 (In re Sweet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In regard to the employment of an auctioneer, I entirely agree with the learned judge of the Western district of Texas in Re Pegues [Case No. 10,907], where he says: “the law contemplates that the assignee shall himself sell the property of the estate. There may be cases in which it would be proper to employ an auctioneer, but the necessity for so doing should be first shown to the court, and leave obtained.” At all events, the as-signee having taken the responsibility upon himself to employ an auctioneer he must now make the necessity of such aid, and the reasonableness of the amount paid therefor, to appear, before he can have that charge allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 F. Cas. 543, 9 Nat. Bank. Reg. 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sweet-mied-1874.