In re Sweeney

134 S. Ct. 2690, 189 L. Ed. 2d 231, 572 U.S. 1133, 82 U.S.L.W. 3686, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 3727
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 27, 2014
DocketNo. 13–9983.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 134 S. Ct. 2690 (In re Sweeney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Sweeney, 134 S. Ct. 2690, 189 L. Ed. 2d 231, 572 U.S. 1133, 82 U.S.L.W. 3686, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 3727 (U.S. 2014).

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) ( per curiam ).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 S. Ct. 2690, 189 L. Ed. 2d 231, 572 U.S. 1133, 82 U.S.L.W. 3686, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 3727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sweeney-scotus-2014.