In re Sweeney
This text of 181 A.D.2d 626 (In re Sweeney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Motion granted, the report of the Hearing Panel confirmed, and the name of petitioner restored to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law and he is reinstated as a member of the Bar and admitted to practice in all of the courts of this State, effective March 26, 1992. Cross-motion to disaffirm the report is denied. Concur — Carro, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
181 A.D.2d 626, 581 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sweeney-nyappdiv-1992.