In re Sweeney

96 A.D.2d 476, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18977
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Sweeney. Read the opinion of the Court — 95 A.D.2d 579

Opinion

— Motion for a stay denied, determination of petition held in abeyance, and respondent suspended from practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York effective as of July 7,1983, and until the further order of this court. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Asch, Silverman, Milonas and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Sweeney, 96 A.D.2d 476, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18977 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

96 A.D.2d 476 (In re Sweeney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.