In re Sweeden

254 P.2d 902, 116 Cal. App. 2d 913, 1953 Cal. App. LEXIS 1162
California Court of Appeal·Decided March 24, 1953·No. Crim. No. 868·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

THE COURT.

Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus, alleging generally the same facts related in People v. Jimmie Sweeden, Jr., Crim No. 937, ante, p. 891 [254 P.2d 899], this day decided. He here cites the same authorities and advances the same reasons there advanced as grounds for his release under this writ. He expresses the claim that the trial court acted arbitrarily in revoking his probation order.

The contentions here made are sufficiently discussed and fully answered in that case. In addition, In re Davis, 37 Cal.2d 872 [236 P.2d 579], holds that the validity of such an order, when reviewed by habeas corpus, should first be sought from the revoking court.

[914]*914I

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Sweeden, 254 P.2d 902, 116 Cal. App. 2d 913, 1953 Cal. App. LEXIS 1162 (Cal. Ct. App. 1953).

254 P.2d 902 (In re Sweeden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Renier
306 P.2d 917 (California Court of Appeal, 1957)
People v. Wertz
302 P.2d 613 (California Court of Appeal, 1956)