In Re Sweed

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re Sweed

190 S.W.3d 890, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 3143, 2006 WL 1037021

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re Sweed. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 1496 →

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 20, 2006·No. 08-06-00062-CV·Published

Opinion

OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

RICHARD BARAJAS, Chief Justice.

Relator James Lee Sweed asks this Court to issue a writ of mandamus against the Honorable Linda Chew, Judge of the 327th District Court of El Paso County. Mandamus will lie only to correct a clear abuse of discretion. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 883, 840 (Tex.1992) (orig. proceeding). Moreover, there must fee no other adequate remedy at law. Id. Based on the record before us, we are unable to conclude that Respondent clearly abused her discretion or that Relator has no other adequate remedy. Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a).

CHEW, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

RICHARD BARAJAS, Chief Justice.

Relator James Lee Sweed asks this Court to issue a writ of mandamus against the Honorable Linda Chew, Judge of the 327th District Court of El Paso County. Mandamus will lie only to correct a clear abuse of discretion. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 883, 840 (Tex.1992) (orig. proceeding). Moreover, there must fee no other adequate remedy at law. Id. Based on the record before us, we are unable to conclude that Respondent clearly abused her discretion or that Relator has no other adequate remedy. Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a).

CHEW, J., not participating.

In Re Sweed, 190 S.W.3d 890, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 3143, 2006 WL 1037021 (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

190 S.W.3d 890 (In Re Sweed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related