In re Sweat

Fourth Circuit

In re Sweat

585 F. App'x 199

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 20, 2014·No. No. 14-1695·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpubhshed PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpubhshed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenon Durell Sweat petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. According, although we grant Sweat’s motion to amend his financial statement and grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition denied by unpubhshed PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpubhshed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenon Durell Sweat petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. According, although we grant Sweat’s motion to amend his financial statement and grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Sweat, 585 F. App'x 199 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

585 F. App'x 199 (In re Sweat) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related