In re Swanick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Swanick

249 A.D. 100, 291 N.Y.S. 193, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5042

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 27, 1936·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The respondent should be suspended for one year for his failure to promptly pay over to his client the money to which she was entitled as the result of the settlement of her claim, with leave to apply for reinstatement at the expiration of that term upon proof of his compliance with the conditions incorporated in the order.

Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Dore, JJ.

Respondent suspended for one year.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The respondent should be suspended for one year for his failure to promptly pay over to his client the money to which she was entitled as the result of the settlement of her claim, with leave to apply for reinstatement at the expiration of that term upon proof of his compliance with the conditions incorporated in the order.

Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Dore, JJ.

Respondent suspended for one year.

In re Swanick, 249 A.D. 100, 291 N.Y.S. 193, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5042 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

249 A.D. 100 (In re Swanick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.