In re Swan

251 A.D.2d 745, 673 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6783
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 10, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 251 A.D.2d 745 (In re Swan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Swan, 251 A.D.2d 745, 673 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6783 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1943. He maintains an office for the practice of law in Elmira, Chemung County.

[746]*746Respondent has tendered his resignation from the Bar in compliance with this Court’s rules (22 NYCRR 806.8). Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, does not object to acceptance of the resignation.

Respondent admits diverting substantial sums from three estates in an unsuccessful attempt to prevent the business failure of a shopping center and restaurant that he owned. It appears that respondent has since made the estates whole and just one of the estates has two extant debts. Respondent has sufficient funds in his trust account to cover the debts.

We accept respondent’s resignation and order his disbarment (see, 22 NYCRR 806.8 [b]).

We further direct respondent to cooperate with petitioner in the prompt formulation of an appropriate restitution order or orders, to the extent petitioner deems such orders necessary, which petitioner shall submit for entry pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (6-a) (e) (see, e.g., Matter of Poersch, 225 AD2d 1018).

Mercure, J. P., White, Yesawich Jr., Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s resignation application, submitted pursuant to 22 NYCRR 806.8, is accepted; and it is further ordered that respondent is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys of the State of New York effective immediately; and is further ordered that respondent is directed to cooperate with petitioner in the prompt formulation of an appropriate restitution order or orders which petitioner shall submit for entry pursuant to Judiciary Law 90 § (6-a) (e); and it is further ordered that respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and he is forbidden to appear as an attorney and counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further ordered that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court’s rule (22 NYCRR 806.9) regulating the conduct of disbarred, suspended or resigned attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Evans
280 A.D.2d 869 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
In re Nicotera
268 A.D.2d 881 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 A.D.2d 745, 673 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-swan-nyappdiv-1998.