In re Swan-Finch Oil Corp.

Second Circuit

In re Swan-Finch Oil Corp.

313 F.2d 140

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJanuary 16, 1963

DocketNo. 260, Docket 27885

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 313 F.2d 140 (In re Swan-Finch Oil Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Swan-Finch Oil Corp., 313 F.2d 140 (2d Cir. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is one of a series of proceedings in the complicated affairs of the debtors in the Chapter X bankruptcy of the debtors described in the title of this case. Under the circumstances we think a reversal of this order might render nugatory and futile further action by Judge Palmieri. See Ferguson v. Tabah, 2 Cir., 1961, 288 F.2d 665, affirming sub nom. Ferguson v. Birrell, S.D.N.Y., 1960, 190 F.Supp. 506; McDonnell v. Tabah, 2 Cir., 1961, 297 F.2d 731, affirming, S.D.N.Y., 1961, 196 F.Supp. 496; Pettit v. Doeskin Products, Inc., 2 Cir., 1959, 270 F.2d 95, rehearing denied, 270 F.2d 699, cert. denied, 362 U.S. 910, 80 S.Ct. 660, 4 L.Ed.2d 618; Saltzman v. Birrell, S.D.N.Y., 1957, 156 F.Supp. 538.

[141]*141The appeal is from the order of November 30, 1962, appointing a receiver of the premises at 1050 Park Avenue, New York City. We affirm. See opinion below filed November 7, 1962, 213 F.Supp. 638.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is one of a series of proceedings in the complicated affairs of the debtors in the Chapter X bankruptcy of the debtors described in the title of this case. Under the circumstances we think a reversal of this order might render nugatory and futile further action by Judge Palmieri. See Ferguson v. Tabah, 2 Cir., 1961, 288 F.2d 665, affirming sub nom. Ferguson v. Birrell, S.D.N.Y., 1960, 190 F.Supp. 506; McDonnell v. Tabah, 2 Cir., 1961, 297 F.2d 731, affirming, S.D.N.Y., 1961, 196 F.Supp. 496; Pettit v. Doeskin Products, Inc., 2 Cir., 1959, 270 F.2d 95, rehearing denied, 270 F.2d 699, cert. denied, 362 U.S. 910, 80 S.Ct. 660, 4 L.Ed.2d 618; Saltzman v. Birrell, S.D.N.Y., 1957, 156 F.Supp. 538.

[141]*141The appeal is from the order of November 30, 1962, appointing a receiver of the premises at 1050 Park Avenue, New York City. We affirm. See opinion below filed November 7, 1962, 213 F.Supp. 638.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

313 F.2d 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-swan-finch-oil-corp-ca2-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack