In re Sutherland

56 A.3d 1224, 2012 WL 6217603
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided December 13, 2012·No. No. 12-BG-1457·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board revoking respondent’s license to practice law in that jurisdiction, this court’s Oeto-ber 3, 2012, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why the functional equivalent reciprocal discipline of disbarment should not be imposed, the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that John A. Sutherland, Jr., is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007), and In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165 (D.C.2006) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Sutherland, 56 A.3d 1224, 2012 WL 6217603 (D.C. 2012).

56 A.3d 1224 (In re Sutherland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Fuller
930 A.2d 194 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)
In re Willingham
900 A.2d 165 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2006)