In re Sussman

152 A.3d 216, 227 N.J. 454, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 7
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 11, 2017·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed with the Court a petition pursuant to Rule l:20-3(g) (4) and Rule 1:20-11, seeking the immediate temporary suspension of DAVID S. SUSSMAN of EAST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 198 0, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DAVID S. SUSSMAN is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that DAVID S. SUSSMAN be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by DAVID S. SUSSMAN pursuant to Rule 1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement expect on application to this Court for good cause shown, pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that DAVID S. SUSSMAN comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of the respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Sussman, 152 A.3d 216, 227 N.J. 454, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 7 (N.J. 2017).

152 A.3d 216 (In re Sussman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.