In Re Suspension or Revocation of Silberman
This text of 418 A.2d 266 (In Re Suspension or Revocation of Silberman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF THE LICENSE OF ALEXANDER SILBERMAN, D.P.M. TO PRACTICE PODIATRY IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Adrian M. Unger argued the cause for appellant Alexander Silberman (Milton M. and Adrian M. Unger, attorneys; Adrian M. Unger and Jack J. Stecher, on the briefs).
Bertram P. Goltz, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent State Board of Medical Examiners (John J. Degnan, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Erminie L. *304 Conley, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Joan D. Gelber, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 169 N.J. Super. 243 (1979).
For affirmance Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER, HANDLER and POLLOCK 7.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
418 A.2d 266, 84 N.J. 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-suspension-or-revocation-of-silberman-nj-1980.