In re Survey of Section Twenty (20)

Supreme Court of Kansas

In re Survey of Section Twenty (20)

126 P. 1093, 87 Kan. 799, 1912 Kan. LEXIS 243

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedOctober 12, 1912

DocketNo. 17,298

StatusPublished

This text of 126 P. 1093 (In re Survey of Section Twenty (20)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Survey of Section Twenty (20), 126 P. 1093, 87 Kan. 799, 1912 Kan. LEXIS 243 (kan 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

In making the survey appealed-from the surveyor ignored the statutory rules prescribed for his guidance and the directions given by this court in Everett v. Lush, 19 Kan. 195, and other cases. He did not utilize the nearest known corners in all directions, did not even take the government field notes with him, acted upon mere assumption when certainty was indispensable, and as a result produced a survey which is' incongruous with the old improvements and long recognized landmarks and boundaries in the vicinity.

It is not enough that some oral evidence was produced in the district court tending to sustain the fruit of this irregular proceeding. The purpose of the survey was to ascertain whether or not the contentions disclosed by this evidence — and opposed by much more, better and stronger evidence — were correct. The survey was valueless for this purpose.

The judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause is remanded with direction to reject the surveyor’s report, and order a survey according to law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

In making the survey appealed-from the surveyor ignored the statutory rules prescribed for his guidance and the directions given by this court in Everett v. Lush, 19 Kan. 195, and other cases. He did not utilize the nearest known corners in all directions, did not even take the government field notes with him, acted upon mere assumption when certainty was indispensable, and as a result produced a survey which is' incongruous with the old improvements and long recognized landmarks and boundaries in the vicinity.

It is not enough that some oral evidence was produced in the district court tending to sustain the fruit of this irregular proceeding. The purpose of the survey was to ascertain whether or not the contentions disclosed by this evidence — and opposed by much more, better and stronger evidence — were correct. The survey was valueless for this purpose.

The judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause is remanded with direction to reject the surveyor’s report, and order a survey according to law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 P. 1093, 87 Kan. 799, 1912 Kan. LEXIS 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-survey-of-section-twenty-20-kan-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack