In re Sup. Ct. Comm. Automt'n
This text of 2016 Ark. 451 (In re Sup. Ct. Comm. Automt'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2016 Ark. 451
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
Opinion Delivered December 8, 2016
IN RE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON AUTOMATION -- CREATION OF TASK FORCE ON UNIFORM CHARGE CODES
PER CURIAM On March 17, 2016, we published proposed changes to Administrative Order No.
8, In re Administrative Order No. 8 – Forms for Reporting Case Information in all Arkansas Trial
Courts, 2016 Ark. 130 (per curiam). The lack of uniform charge codes has been a recurrent
issue in various phases of the process to automate the court system, implement electronic
filing, and exchange data between agencies. Although various agencies have been working
to try to increase consistency in the use of charge codes between systems, we conclude that
a uniform committee should undertake the project.
The court hereby creates the Task Force on Uniform Charge Codes, which will be
subordinate to the Supreme Court Committee on Automation. The task force is charged
with developing a set of uniform charge codes that shall, upon the court’s approval, be used
on all reporting forms and relevant filings in all Arkansas courts. We appoint the following
to serve on the task force:
Hon. Doug Schrantz, Circuit Judge, 19-W Judicial Circuit
Hon. Lynn Williams, Circuit Judge, 18-E Judicial Circuit Cite as 2016 Ark. 451
Nathan Smith, Prosecuting Attorney, 19-W Judicial Circuit
Cody Hiland, Prosecuting Attorney, 20th Judicial Circuit
Lori Kumpuris, Office of Prosecutor Coordinator
Brad Cazort, Arkansas Crime Information Center
Brenda Deshields, Benton County Circuit Clerk
Candace Edwards, Craighead County Circuit Clerk
Sandy Moll, Arkansas Sentencing Commission
Tim Holthoff, Administrative Office of the Courts
Krystal A. Mann, Administrative Office of the Courts
The term of these appointments is two years. We will address other committee issues at a
later date. The court thanks these appointees for their willingness to serve on this important
endeavor.
No changes to current practice regarding charge codes shall be mandated by the
Administrative Office of the Courts until the task force recommends uniform charge codes
or interim guidelines that are subsequently approved by this court. The task force should
consult with other persons and agencies with knowledge or expertise that is relevant to the
work of the task force. The task force shall report by June 30, 2017, to the Automation
Committee and this court on the progress of the task force’s work.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2016 Ark. 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sup-ct-comm-automtn-ark-2016.