In re Sung K. Chun

189 A.3d 706
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided August 2, 2018·No. 18-BG-464·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction for thirty days by consent; this court's June 4, 2018, amended order directing respondent to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; and it appearing that respondent failed to file a response to the court's show cause order but did file his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit on June 15, 2018, it is

ORDERED that Sung K. Chun is hereby suspended from the practice of law in this jurisdiction for a period of thirty days nunc pro tunc to June 15, 2018. See In re Sibley , 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010) ; In re Fuller , 930 A.2d 194 , 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Sung K. Chun, 189 A.3d 706 (D.C. 2018).

189 A.3d 706 (In re Sung K. Chun) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Sibley
990 A.2d 483 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)
In Re Fuller
930 A.2d 194 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)