In re Sunberg

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Sunberg

719 A.2d 158, 156 N.J. 396, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 1978

DecidedOctober 23, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 719 A.2d 158 (In re Sunberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sunberg, 719 A.2d 158, 156 N.J. 396, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 1978 (N.J. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

[397]*397ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on June 30, 1998, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that KENNETH M. SUN-BERG of CALDWELL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1978, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.2(a) (failure to consult with client as to means by which objectives of representation are to be pursued), RPC 8.1(a) (false statements of material fact in connection with a disciplinary matter), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that KENNETH M. SUNBERG is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[397]*397ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on June 30, 1998, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that KENNETH M. SUN-BERG of CALDWELL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1978, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.2(a) (failure to consult with client as to means by which objectives of representation are to be pursued), RPC 8.1(a) (false statements of material fact in connection with a disciplinary matter), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that KENNETH M. SUNBERG is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

719 A.2d 158, 156 N.J. 396, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 1978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sunberg-nj-1998.