In re Summers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Summers

173 A.D. 961, 159 N.Y.S. 86

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 173 A.D. 961 (In re Summers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Summers, 173 A.D. 961, 159 N.Y.S. 86 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Respondent was admitted to the bar in October, 1911. On the 24th of March, 1916, at the Trial Term of the Supreme Court held in and for the county of Kings, respondent was duly convicted upon his plea of guilty of a felony, to wit, attempting grand larceny in the first degree. A certified copy of such judgment of conviction having been presented to this court, the name of the respondent must be ordered to be stricken from the roll of attorneys, under the provisions of paragraph 3 of section 88 of the Judiciary Law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Respondent was admitted to the bar in October, 1911. On the 24th of March, 1916, at the Trial Term of the Supreme Court held in and for the county of Kings, respondent was duly convicted upon his plea of guilty of a felony, to wit, attempting grand larceny in the first degree. A certified copy of such judgment of conviction having been presented to this court, the name of the respondent must be ordered to be stricken from the roll of attorneys, under the provisions of paragraph 3 of section 88 of the Judiciary Law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 A.D. 961, 159 N.Y.S. 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-summers-nyappdiv-1916.