In re Summer

384 S.E.2d 592, 299 S.C. 268, 1989 S.C. LEXIS 172
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedOctober 4, 1989
StatusPublished

This text of 384 S.E.2d 592 (In re Summer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Summer, 384 S.E.2d 592, 299 S.C. 268, 1989 S.C. LEXIS 172 (S.C. 1989).

Opinion

ORDER

It appears from the Petition and supporting affidavits that Respondent is a licensed attorney, subject to the jurisdiction of this Court under the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure; and it further appearing that Respondent suffers from a mental infirmity or illness that has incapacitated him from the practice of law, this Court finds that the Respondent is incapacitated from continuing to practice law due to illness.

IT IS ORDERED that the Respondent, Walter Baker Summer, be and hereby is transferred to disability inactive status on the grounds of the disability as described in the Petition, for an indefinite period and until the further Order of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
384 S.E.2d 592, 299 S.C. 268, 1989 S.C. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-summer-sc-1989.