In re Summer

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Summer

384 S.E.2d 592, 299 S.C. 268, 1989 S.C. LEXIS 172

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided October 4, 1989·Published

Opinion

ORDER

It appears from the Petition and supporting affidavits that Respondent is a licensed attorney, subject to the jurisdiction of this Court under the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure; and it further appearing that Respondent suffers from a mental infirmity or illness that has incapacitated him from the practice of law, this Court finds that the Respondent is incapacitated from continuing to practice law due to illness.

IT IS ORDERED that the Respondent, Walter Baker Summer, be and hereby is transferred to disability inactive status on the grounds of the disability as described in the Petition, for an indefinite period and until the further Order of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

It appears from the Petition and supporting affidavits that Respondent is a licensed attorney, subject to the jurisdiction of this Court under the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure; and it further appearing that Respondent suffers from a mental infirmity or illness that has incapacitated him from the practice of law, this Court finds that the Respondent is incapacitated from continuing to practice law due to illness.

IT IS ORDERED that the Respondent, Walter Baker Summer, be and hereby is transferred to disability inactive status on the grounds of the disability as described in the Petition, for an indefinite period and until the further Order of this Court.

In re Summer, 384 S.E.2d 592, 299 S.C. 268, 1989 S.C. LEXIS 172 (S.C. 1989).

Pincite

384 S.E.2d 592 (In re Summer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.