In re Sullivan
239 A.D. 810
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Sullivan. Read the opinion of the Court — 237 A.D. 551 →
Opinion
The movant apparently misapprehends the record upon which the order heretofore made, by this court was granted. The resolution of the Bar Association of Northern Chautauqua was not in any way considered by this, court in mating its. determination. The motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals is- denied because in our opinion no reviewable question of law is presented. Crosby, J., not sitting. [See 237 App. Div. 551.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Sullivan, 239 A.D. 810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
239 A.D. 810 (In re Sullivan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Sullivan
237 A.D. 551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)