In re Sullivan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Sullivan

192 A.D. 885

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1920

StatusPublished

This text of 192 A.D. 885 (In re Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sullivan, 192 A.D. 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Decree and order of the Surrogate’s Court of Bongs county affirmed, with costs to the respondent. (Matter of Budlong, 126 N. Y. 423.) No opinion. Rich, Putnam and Jaycox, JJ., concur; Blackmar, J., dissents on the ground that there was no evidence of undue influence or fraud which the jury were justified in finding influenced the testamentary disposition exercised several years afterward, with whom Jenks, P. J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decree and order of the Surrogate’s Court of Bongs county affirmed, with costs to the respondent. (Matter of Budlong, 126 N. Y. 423.) No opinion. Rich, Putnam and Jaycox, JJ., concur; Blackmar, J., dissents on the ground that there was no evidence of undue influence or fraud which the jury were justified in finding influenced the testamentary disposition exercised several years afterward, with whom Jenks, P. J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 A.D. 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sullivan-nyappdiv-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack