In re Suggested Charge to Grand Jury

26 Fla. Supp. 122

This text of 26 Fla. Supp. 122 (In re Suggested Charge to Grand Jury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court of the 19th Judicial Circuit of Florida, St. Lucie County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Suggested Charge to Grand Jury, 26 Fla. Supp. 122 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1963).

Opinion

WALLACE SAMPLE, Circuit Judge.

Explanatory note: This general charge to the grand jury has been compiled and drafted in such manner that the individual presiding judge may—■

(1) delete those portions he deems non-essential for each particular occasion, without lessening the overall effect, and

(2) insert special charges, as required, without disrupting the sequence.

Related subjects have been grouped together under appropriate titles. The numbering of each paragraph makes for easier revisions, deletions and additions.

[123]*123It is a fairly comprehensive charge, but not all inclusive. Within its framework will be found all the necessary basic elements needed to charge a grand jury in any county in the state of Florida.

Legislation concerning grand juries has been enacted which does not affect all counties of the state, particularly with reference to the total number of jurors and the establishment of jury commissions. Such legislation has not been given consideration here but provision therefor may be added in those counties where needed.

Citations are not included because the Florida decisions on the subject, as in many other jurisdictions, are not so numerous as to preclude complete review by any individual interested in the subject. With few exceptions all passages have their basis in the statutory or case law of Florida.

To assure a practical approach in the drafting of the charge, some thirty circuit judges throughout the state were contacted and charges secured from most of them for examination and study. In most cases their charges are representative of those used by other judges in their circuit. They vary considerably in length, scope and content; however, practically all have some features in common. Effort has been made to include herein the better features of each.

Justice Elwyn Thomas of the Supreme Court and Judge A. O. Kanner of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, whose combined judicial experience totals 29 years at the trial level and 31 years at the appellate level, kindly reviewed a preliminary draft of the charges and contributed many thoughtful and constructive suggestions which were included in the final draft.

SUGGESTED CHARGE TO GRAND JURY

1 —PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

1.1) You (Number) (ladies and) gentlemen constitute the Grand Jury of the County of_I_for this term of Court. The time during which you will serve begins today and will continue until the 1st (2nd, 3rd, 4th, last) Monday (Tuesday) in (Month). During this period you are subject to being recalled as and when circumstances may require reconvening the Grand Jury; otherwise your sessions will be limited to consideration of matters to be presented to you at this time.

1.2) Before you begin your work, it is necessary that you have a thorough understanding of the duties and functions of the Grand Jury and the power which now reposes in you. Further, you should fully understand that the enormous power vested in the Grand Jury carries equally grave and profound responsibility to see that this power is not abused, in any manner whatsoever.

[124]*1241.3) Your duties are those of an independent inquisitorial and investigative body — both as to criminal matters and civil matters. You are responsible to no one except the Court itself.

1.4) There is no greater deterrent to evil and corruption than the inquiring mind and searching eye of a Grand Jury; and, it is universally recognized that in time of peace no citizen assumes a more responsible duty of citizenship than a Grand Juror. No other group of citizens exercises functions more vital to the administration of law and order.

1.5) The Grand Jury system has come down to us through history; its effectiveness and its value to free people have been proven beyond doubt during the 700 years of its existence. The Grand Jury is the guardian of all that is comprehended in the police power of the state.

1.6) The Grand Jury is both a sword and a shield in the hands of the people — it is a sword because the power of a Grand Jury strikes terror in the hearts of those who violate the law — and it is a shield because it has the power, and it has the duty, to protect the innocent against persecution.

1.7) You will find your service as a Grand Juror to be a wholesome, satisfying and rewarding experience, for by it you will participate directly in the administration of justice. You will also, if the Grand Jury so directs, have an opportunity to inquire into, and examine and investigate, all phases of civil administration and local government. Such responsibility and opportunity to render public service should bring forth your most whole-hearted and conscientious efforts — and I know it will — for such is one of the keystones of our democracy; that is, citizens from every walk of life, like you, are called into service to exercise their honest convictions and honest judgment in the administration of justice and the affairs of the government freely, unhampered and without any restraint whatever — except as the Grand Jury is surrounded by the limitations and requirements of the law itself.

1.8) The importance of your work as the Grand Jury of this County must be realized by each of you, and kept in mind at all times during your investigations and deliberations.

2 — CRIMINAL INSTRUCTIONS

2.1) One of the safeguards of our system of justice is the constitutional provision which provides that no person may be tried for a capital crime except on presentment and indictment by a Grand Jury. A capital crime is one which is punishable by death.

2.2) The function of the Grand Jury in the investigation of crimes is to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to justify an indictment against the accused person.

2.3) It is not your province to try the case and determine the guilt or innocence of the accused, and you are not expected to do so.

[125]*125The guilt or innocence of the accused is determined by a trial (petit) jury empanelled specially to try each case. That jury hears all the evidence, on both sides, under the supervision of the trial judge, in the presence of the accused and his counsel, and renders a verdict only after counsel for the accused has had an opportunity to argue the case to the jury, and the trial judge has charged the jury specially on the law applicable to the case. Thus, or in this manner, are all the constitutional rights of the accused protected and preserved.

It is your duty to ascertain whether there is “probable cause” a crime has been committed by the person so accused, and if the evidence is sufficient to constitute “probable cause” then it is your duty to find a “true bill” which, when it is properly returned in open Court, becomes the “indictment” upon which a trial may be held.

“Probable cause”, which must be shown to your satisfaction before you should vote to return a “True Bill”, has been defined as “a reasonable ground of suspicion, supported by circumstances sufficiently strong in themselves to warrant a cautious man in the belief that a particular person is guilty of a particular crime”.

As to the degree of proof necessary before you should vote in favor of returning “A True Bill”, I have just stated that if you find probable cause to exist that one has violated the law, then you should vote for returning “A True Bill”.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 Fla. Supp. 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-suggested-charge-to-grand-jury-flacirct19stl-1963.