in Re Sugar Land Urban Air UATP Management, LLC and UATP Holdings, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 12, 2023
Docket14-23-00014-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Sugar Land Urban Air UATP Management, LLC and UATP Holdings, LLC (in Re Sugar Land Urban Air UATP Management, LLC and UATP Holdings, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Sugar Land Urban Air UATP Management, LLC and UATP Holdings, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed January 12, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00014-CV

IN RE SUGAR LAND URBAN AIR; UATP MANAGEMENT, LLC AND UATP HOLDINGS, LLC, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 190th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2022-33408

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 9, 2023, relators Sugar Land Urban Air; UATP Management, LLC and UATP Holdings, LLC filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In their petition, relators ask this Court to compel the Honorable Beau A. Miller, presiding judge of the 190th District Court of Harris County, to: (1) vacate the trial court’s December 22, 2022 order setting an evidentiary hearing and compelling discovery from relators; (2) order respondent to reverse its order denying relators’ motion to compel arbitration; and (3) order respondent to compel the parties to arbitration.

Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. The portion of relators’ petition that requests this Court to set aside the December 22, 2022 order compelling discovery and setting an evidentiary hearing is denied. The portion of relators’ petition that requests this Court to order respondent to reverse its order denying relators’ motion to compel arbitration and to compel the parties to arbitration is denied without prejudice because respondent has not ruled on relators’ motion to compel arbitration.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Poissant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Sugar Land Urban Air UATP Management, LLC and UATP Holdings, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sugar-land-urban-air-uatp-management-llc-and-uatp-holdings-llc-texapp-2023.