In re Sugar

117 So. 3d 914, 2013 WL 2372169, 2013 La. LEXIS 1238
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 31, 2013
DocketNo. 2013-B-0874
StatusPublished

This text of 117 So. 3d 914 (In re Sugar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Sugar, 117 So. 3d 914, 2013 WL 2372169, 2013 La. LEXIS 1238 (La. 2013).

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

| Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which re[915]*915spondent admitted that she neglected legal matters, failed to communicate with clients, failed to refund unearned fees, failed to properly supervise a non-lawyer assistant, engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, and failed to cooperate with the ODC in its investigations. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Helene Melissa Sugar, Louisiana Bar Roll number 24718, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of thirty months, retroactive to June 2, 2010, the date of her interim suspension. It is further ordered that respondent shall make full restitution to all former clients.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 So. 3d 914, 2013 WL 2372169, 2013 La. LEXIS 1238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sugar-la-2013.