in Re SuEllen Hoeflinger-Hotchkiss
This text of in Re SuEllen Hoeflinger-Hotchkiss (in Re SuEllen Hoeflinger-Hotchkiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 3, 2020
No. 04-19-00872-CV
IN RE SuEllen HOEFLINGER-HOTCHKISS
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
ORDER
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Irene Rios, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
On December 17, 2019, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which relator also requested a stay of trial court proceedings pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus. This court believes a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real parties in interest may file a response to the petition in this court no later than January 21, 2020. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.
Relator’s request for a stay is DENIED.
It is so ORDERED on January 3, 2020.
PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO: _________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018PC0587, styled In the Estate of Gregory Lyle Hotchkiss a/k/a Gregory L. Hotchkiss, Deceased, pending in the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Oscar J. Kazen presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re SuEllen Hoeflinger-Hotchkiss, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-suellen-hoeflinger-hotchkiss-texapp-2020.