In re Subpoena No. 22
718 A.2d 1245, 553 Pa. 231, 1998 Pa. LEXIS 2191
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 6, 1998·No. Petition No. 235 Middle District Allocatur Docket 1998·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 6th day of October, 1998, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED limited to the issue of whether the psychotherapist-client privilege prohibits disclosure of confidential communications following the client’s death.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Subpoena No. 22, 718 A.2d 1245, 553 Pa. 231, 1998 Pa. LEXIS 2191 (Pa. 1998).
718 A.2d 1245 (In re Subpoena No. 22) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Branham v. Rohm and Haas Co.
19 A.3d 1094 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Joyner v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
736 A.2d 35 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1999)