In re Subpoena Duces Tecum by the Bd. of Commrs. on Grievances & Discipline of the Supreme Court of Ohio for Probation File

721 N.E.2d 118, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1472, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3842
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 16, 1999
Docket99-1486
StatusPublished

This text of 721 N.E.2d 118 (In re Subpoena Duces Tecum by the Bd. of Commrs. on Grievances & Discipline of the Supreme Court of Ohio for Probation File) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Subpoena Duces Tecum by the Bd. of Commrs. on Grievances & Discipline of the Supreme Court of Ohio for Probation File, 721 N.E.2d 118, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1472, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3842 (Ohio 1999).

Opinion

On August 10, 1999, petitioners filed a Petition for Relief from Subpoena Duces Tecum of Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline for Probation File Records. On September 8, 1999, the Cleveland Bar Association filed a motion for leave to intervene and a motion to seal proceedings. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that petitioners’ Petition for Relief from Subpoena Duces Tecum be, and hereby is, denied.

Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for leave to intervene by the Cleveland Bar Association be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that intervenor’s motion to seal proceedings be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
721 N.E.2d 118, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1472, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-subpoena-duces-tecum-by-the-bd-of-commrs-on-grievances-discipline-ohio-1999.