In Re Stutts

95 S.E.2d 919, 245 N.C. 405, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 569
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 11, 1957·No. 528·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER OuRiam.

There is competent evidence in the Record to support the Employment Security Commission’s findings of fact that claimant at the time his claim was filed, is unemployed, because he was discharged for misconduct connected with his work. Such a finding supports its conclusion and decision that claimant was disqualified for benefits for nine consecutive weeks. G.S. 96-14(b). Such findings of fact by the Commission supported by competent evidence are binding upon review. G.S. 96-4 (m); Employment Security Com. v. Smith, 235 N.C. 104, 69 S.E. 2d 32.

The ruling of the Commission was affirmed in all respects on appeal to the Superior Court. It is supported by the language of the statute and the evidence. No reason appears to disturb the judgment below.

Affirmed.

JohnsoN, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Stutts, 95 S.E.2d 919, 245 N.C. 405, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 569 (N.C. 1957).

95 S.E.2d 919 (In Re Stutts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yelverton v. Kemp Furniture Industries, Inc.
275 S.E.2d 553 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1981)
Matter of Cantrell
263 S.E.2d 1 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)
In Re Collingsworth
194 S.E.2d 210 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1973)
Blue Jeans Corp. v. AMALGAMATED CLOTH. WKRS. OF AM.
169 S.E.2d 867 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1969)
In Re Abernathy
130 S.E.2d 292 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)