In Re Stutts

Supreme Court of North Carolina

In Re Stutts

95 S.E.2d 919, 245 N.C. 405, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 569

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedJanuary 11, 1957

Docket528

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 95 S.E.2d 919 (In Re Stutts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Stutts, 95 S.E.2d 919, 245 N.C. 405, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 569 (N.C. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER OuRiam.

There is competent evidence in the Record to support the Employment Security Commission’s findings of fact that claimant at the time his claim was filed, is unemployed, because he was discharged for misconduct connected with his work. Such a finding supports its conclusion and decision that claimant was disqualified for benefits for nine consecutive weeks. G.S. 96-14(b). Such findings of fact by the Commission supported by competent evidence are binding upon review. G.S. 96-4 (m); Employment Security Com. v. Smith, 235 N.C. 104, 69 S.E. 2d 32.

The ruling of the Commission was affirmed in all respects on appeal to the Superior Court. It is supported by the language of the statute and the evidence. No reason appears to disturb the judgment below.

Affirmed.

JohnsoN, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER OuRiam.

There is competent evidence in the Record to support the Employment Security Commission’s findings of fact that claimant at the time his claim was filed, is unemployed, because he was discharged for misconduct connected with his work. Such a finding supports its conclusion and decision that claimant was disqualified for benefits for nine consecutive weeks. G.S. 96-14(b). Such findings of fact by the Commission supported by competent evidence are binding upon review. G.S. 96-4 (m); Employment Security Com. v. Smith, 235 N.C. 104, 69 S.E. 2d 32.

The ruling of the Commission was affirmed in all respects on appeal to the Superior Court. It is supported by the language of the statute and the evidence. No reason appears to disturb the judgment below.

Affirmed.

JohnsoN, J., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 S.E.2d 919, 245 N.C. 405, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stutts-nc-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack