In re Sturm

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Sturm

2009 Ohio 1060, 903 N.E.2d 635, 121 Ohio St. 3d 268

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 17, 2009

Docket2007-0229

StatusPublished

This text of 2009 Ohio 1060 (In re Sturm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sturm, 2009 Ohio 1060, 903 N.E.2d 635, 121 Ohio St. 3d 268 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. D.H., 120 Ohio St.3d 540. 2009-Ohio-9, 901 N.E.2d 209.

*269 Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Jill E. Beeler and Molly J. Bruns, Assistant State Public Defenders, for appellant, Bryan Christopher Sturm. Katherine Hunt Federle and Jason A. Macke, urging reversal for amicus curiae, The Justice for Children Project. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. D.H., 120 Ohio St.3d 540. 2009-Ohio-9, 901 N.E.2d 209.

*269 Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Jill E. Beeler and Molly J. Bruns, Assistant State Public Defenders, for appellant, Bryan Christopher Sturm. Katherine Hunt Federle and Jason A. Macke, urging reversal for amicus curiae, The Justice for Children Project. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2009 Ohio 1060, 903 N.E.2d 635, 121 Ohio St. 3d 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sturm-ohio-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack