In re Sturm

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Sturm

2009 Ohio 1060, 903 N.E.2d 635, 121 Ohio St. 3d 268

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 17, 2009·No. 2007-0229·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. D.H., 120 Ohio St.3d 540. 2009-Ohio-9, 901 N.E.2d 209.

*269 Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Jill E. Beeler and Molly J. Bruns, Assistant State Public Defenders, for appellant, Bryan Christopher Sturm. Katherine Hunt Federle and Jason A. Macke, urging reversal for amicus curiae, The Justice for Children Project. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. D.H., 120 Ohio St.3d 540. 2009-Ohio-9, 901 N.E.2d 209.

*269 Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Jill E. Beeler and Molly J. Bruns, Assistant State Public Defenders, for appellant, Bryan Christopher Sturm. Katherine Hunt Federle and Jason A. Macke, urging reversal for amicus curiae, The Justice for Children Project. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

In re Sturm, 2009 Ohio 1060, 903 N.E.2d 635, 121 Ohio St. 3d 268 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

2009 Ohio 1060 (In re Sturm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related