In re Sturgeon

Second Circuit

In re Sturgeon

139 F. 608, 71 C.C.A. 592, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3908

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMay 5, 1905

DocketNo. 212

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 139 F. 608 (In re Sturgeon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sturgeon, 139 F. 608, 71 C.C.A. 592, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3908 (2d Cir. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Under General Order No. 22 (18 Sup. Ct. vii) the duty of the referee is to receive the evidence which is offered, to note objections, and to record the evidence; and, if either party persists in offering incompetent or irrelevant matter in evidence, the other party has a remedy, because the rule provides that “the court shall have power to deal with the costs of incompetent, immaterial, or irrelevant depositions, or parts of them, as may be just.” The equity practice is to be followed by referees. The order directs him to proceed as referee. The referee must take all the evidence and note objections.

The order is affirmed under General Order No. 22, but without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Under General Order No. 22 (18 Sup. Ct. vii) the duty of the referee is to receive the evidence which is offered, to note objections, and to record the evidence; and, if either party persists in offering incompetent or irrelevant matter in evidence, the other party has a remedy, because the rule provides that “the court shall have power to deal with the costs of incompetent, immaterial, or irrelevant depositions, or parts of them, as may be just.” The equity practice is to be followed by referees. The order directs him to proceed as referee. The referee must take all the evidence and note objections.

The order is affirmed under General Order No. 22, but without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 F. 608, 71 C.C.A. 592, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sturgeon-ca2-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack