In re Studtmann

79 P.3d 1285, 276 Kan. 736, 2003 Kan. LEXIS 713
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided November 24, 2003·No. Bar Docket No. 17370·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

At the time the respondent surrendered his license, a formal complaint had been filed in which it was alleged that the respondent was dilatory in filing a bankruptcy for his client. In addition, it was alleged that the respondent misled his client about the filing of the bankruptcy and misled an attorney for a creditor in the bankruptcy as to the status of the bankruptcy case.

This court, having examined the files of the office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds that the surrender of the respondent’s license should be accepted and that the respondent should be disbarred.

It Is Therefore Ordered that John M. Studtmann be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Kansas and his license and privilege to practice law are hereby revoked.

It Is Further Ordered that the Clerk of the Appellate Courts strike the name of John M. Studtmann from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports, that the costs therein shall be assessed to the respondent, and that the respondent forthwith shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2003 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 286).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Studtmann, 79 P.3d 1285, 276 Kan. 736, 2003 Kan. LEXIS 713 (kan 2003).

79 P.3d 1285 (In re Studtmann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Studtmann (
Supreme Court of Kansas, 2017