In re Stuart

255 A.D. 811, 7 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9321

This text of 255 A.D. 811 (In re Stuart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Stuart, 255 A.D. 811, 7 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9321 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Nassau county granting an application for the appointment of a guardian of the person of John Walker Stuart, an infant over fourteen years of age, modified by striking out the name of Frank A. McNamee, Jr., and substituting therefor the name of Charles M. Stuart, the father, and by inserting a provision that the infant remain at the school which he now attends. As so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. The rule is well established that, in the absence of proof showing that a surviving parent is of bad character or otherwise unfit to have the custody of his minor child, his right to custody is paramount to that of any stranger or other relative. (Dom. Rel. Law, § 81; Matter of Thorne, 240 N. Y. 444, 448, 449; People ex rel. Boulware v. Martens, 232 App. Div. 258; affd., 258 N. Y. 534; People ex rel. Sica v. Addeo, 240 App. Div. 723; People ex rel. Hausler v. Stegmeier, Id. 901; affd., 264 N. Y. 483.) Nor, in the absence of a showing of unfitness, is this absolute right of a surviving parent to the custody of his child destroyed or affected by a decree of divorce rendered against him, (Matter [812]*812of Thorne, 240 N. Y. 444.) It was stipulated in open court that the father, if appointed, would permit the infant to remain at the school in which he is now a student. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People Ex Rel. Hausler v. Stegmeier
191 N.E. 526 (New York Court of Appeals, 1934)
People Ex Rel. Boulware v. Martens
180 N.E. 321 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)
People ex rel. Boulware v. Martens
232 A.D. 258 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)
People ex rel. Sica v. Addeo
240 A.D. 723 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 A.D. 811, 7 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stuart-nyappdiv-1938.