In re Stringer's Estate

New York Supreme Court

In re Stringer's Estate

22 N.Y.S. 44, 67 Hun 107, 74 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 107

DecidedFebruary 13, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 22 N.Y.S. 44 (In re Stringer's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Stringer's Estate, 22 N.Y.S. 44, 67 Hun 107, 74 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 107 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

BARNARD, P. J.

William Lang and Cecelia A. Howell weix on the 20th of July, 1888, duly qualified as executors of Eliza Stringer, deceased. Both continued to act as such until September, 1889. Lang was a creditor of the estate, and Cecelia A. Howell was the general residuary legatee. In September, 1889, Lang filed his petition for a final settlement. All parties were cited. On the return day, September 23, 1889, Lang presented his bill. It was objected to, and rejected. A new trial was granted, and upon the new trial the claim was allowed; but the court held that the delivery of the property under the first decree deprived the surrogate of all power to compel restitution to the claimant, Lang. This is a hard rule. Lang had enough property to pay his claim until he was compelled to surrender it under an erroneous decree. , The legatee was also executor, and could not finally take as legatee until the judgment on the distribution and final settlement was sustained. When the case went back to the surrogate, it stood in law as if the claim had been allowed in the first instance. . There is no evidence in the case that Lang paid his coexecutor or legatee. Sho had as much right to the possession of the assets as her coexecutor, and neither she nor her coexecutor could give away to a legatee the assets until the debts were paid. Lang’s debt was from the estate, and not from his coexecutor, even if she was a legatee. The judgment, so far as appealed from, should be reversed, with costs out of estate, and Lang be decreed entitled thereto out of the property on hand when he presented his claim. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARNARD, P. J.

William Lang and Cecelia A. Howell weix on the 20th of July, 1888, duly qualified as executors of Eliza Stringer, deceased. Both continued to act as such until September, 1889. Lang was a creditor of the estate, and Cecelia A. Howell was the general residuary legatee. In September, 1889, Lang filed his petition for a final settlement. All parties were cited. On the return day, September 23, 1889, Lang presented his bill. It was objected to, and rejected. A new trial was granted, and upon the new trial the claim was allowed; but the court held that the delivery of the property under the first decree deprived the surrogate of all power to compel restitution to the claimant, Lang. This is a hard rule. Lang had enough property to pay his claim until he was compelled to surrender it under an erroneous decree. , The legatee was also executor, and could not finally take as legatee until the judgment on the distribution and final settlement was sustained. When the case went back to the surrogate, it stood in law as if the claim had been allowed in the first instance. . There is no evidence in the case that Lang paid his coexecutor or legatee. Sho had as much right to the possession of the assets as her coexecutor, and neither she nor her coexecutor could give away to a legatee the assets until the debts were paid. Lang’s debt was from the estate, and not from his coexecutor, even if she was a legatee. The judgment, so far as appealed from, should be reversed, with costs out of estate, and Lang be decreed entitled thereto out of the property on hand when he presented his claim. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 N.Y.S. 44, 67 Hun 107, 74 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stringers-estate-nysupct-1893.