In re Streusand

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Streusand

256 A.D. 746, 11 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4834

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 5, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D. 746 (In re Streusand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Streusand, 256 A.D. 746, 11 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4834 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The respondent is censured because of the negligent manner in which he conducted the litigation of Mrs. Isabel Sullivan and the incorrect information he gave her concerning the status thereof. He is also censured for inserting in the stipulation settling the case of his client, Isabel Oppenheim, a statement that he held in escrow a duly executed release when such was not the fact.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townlby, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.

Respondent censured.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The respondent is censured because of the negligent manner in which he conducted the litigation of Mrs. Isabel Sullivan and the incorrect information he gave her concerning the status thereof. He is also censured for inserting in the stipulation settling the case of his client, Isabel Oppenheim, a statement that he held in escrow a duly executed release when such was not the fact.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townlby, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.

Respondent censured.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 746, 11 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-streusand-nyappdiv-1939.