In Re Street

21 A.3d 1004, 2011 WL 2473476
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided June 23, 2011·No. 11-BG-304·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order of the Supreme Court of the State of Oregon accepting the stipulation for discipline and suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction for a period of one year, but with eight months stayed pending completion of a two year probationary period, this court’s April 5, 2011, *1005 order directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent filed his affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that, Jeffrey L. Street, Esquire, is hereby suspended for a period of one year, nunc pro tunc to April 5, 2011, eight months of the suspension is hereby stayed and respondent shall serve a two year probationary period subject to the terms imposed by the state of Oregon. See In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007) and In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165 (D.C.2006) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Street, 21 A.3d 1004, 2011 WL 2473476 (D.C. 2011).

21 A.3d 1004 (In Re Street) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Fuller
930 A.2d 194 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)
In re Willingham
900 A.2d 165 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2006)