In re Strang
This text of 166 F. 779 (In re Strang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
I am entirely satisfied that the memorandum in the handwriting of the deceased clerk of Maitland Phelps & Co. was admissible in evidence. The books were lost or destroyed years ago. This clerk was engaged in the regular course of his business, when, under the directions of his employers, he undertook to make a memorandum of what appeared on the books of a firm indebted to them. The paper proved to be in his handwriting is clearly within the rule. Act March 2, 1867, c. 176, 14 Stat. 5Í7.
I concur fully in the opinion of the district judge. Order affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 F. 779, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 5463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-strang-circtsdny-1908.