In re Stovell

187 A.3d 554
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 28, 2018
DocketNo. 18–BG–115
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 187 A.3d 554 (In re Stovell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Stovell, 187 A.3d 554 (D.C. 2018).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

In this case, the Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that respondent Leicester B. Stovell be disbarred based on Hearing Committee findings that he intentionally misappropriated client funds entrusted to him. See In re Edwards , 990 A.2d 501, 518-19 (D.C. 2010) ; In re Addams , 579 A.2d 190, 193 (D.C. 1990) (en banc). No exceptions having been filed to the Board's report, we impose the recommended discipline. See D.C. Bar R. XI, § 9 (h)(2). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Leicester B. Stovell is hereby disbarred. For purposes of reinstatement the period of respondent's disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files a D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Douglas B. Evans, Sr.
187 A.3d 554 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 A.3d 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stovell-dc-2018.