In re Stovall

California Court of Appeal

In re Stovall

136 Cal. App. 322

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJanuary 22, 1934

DocketCrim. No. 2493

StatusPublished

This text of 136 Cal. App. 322 (In re Stovall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Stovall, 136 Cal. App. 322 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

STEPHENS, P. J.

Petitioner was regularly bound over to the superior court for trial for pandering. He complains to this court that there was not sufficient evidence produced at the hearing to legally justify his being held for trial.

There is sufficient evidence to justify the belief that such a crime was committed in Ms residence. There is evidence of his implication and knowledge.

The writ is discharged.

Craig, J., and Archbald, J., pro tern., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STEPHENS, P. J.

Petitioner was regularly bound over to the superior court for trial for pandering. He complains to this court that there was not sufficient evidence produced at the hearing to legally justify his being held for trial.

There is sufficient evidence to justify the belief that such a crime was committed in Ms residence. There is evidence of his implication and knowledge.

The writ is discharged.

Craig, J., and Archbald, J., pro tern., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 Cal. App. 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stovall-calctapp-1934.