In Re Stonecipher Distributors, Inc.

80 B.R. 949, 1987 WL 33068
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas
DecidedFebruary 3, 1987
DocketBankruptcy HS 81-86
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 80 B.R. 949 (In Re Stonecipher Distributors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Stonecipher Distributors, Inc., 80 B.R. 949, 1987 WL 33068 (Ark. 1987).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROBERT F. FUSSELL, Bankruptcy Judge.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Now before the Court for decision is the issue of whether pre-petition interest due and owing the United States on unpaid taxes subject to priority pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(7) 1 should also be afforded priority status.

The Bankruptcy Code accords priority status to certain “allowed secured claims of governmental units.” 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(7) (emphasis added). “Claim,” as defined in 11 U.S.C. § 101(4), means a “right to payment.” This Court now concludes that the broad definition of “claim” includes a right to payment for the interest due. See, e.g., Matter of Keller & Katkowsky, P.C., 55 B.R. 155, 156 (Bkrtcy.E.D.Mich.1985); In re Treister, 52 B.R. 735, 737 (Bkrtcy.S.D.N.Y.1985); In re Coleman, 26 B.R. 825, 831 (Bkrtcy.D.Kan.1985) (debtor concedes priority claim under § 507(a)(6) [which is now § 507(a)(7) ] includes any interest that accrued on the claim pre-petition). See also In re Hernando Appliances, Inc., 41 B.R. 24 (Bkrtcy.N.D.Miss.1983) (discussing tax penalties as well as interest). Contra In re Razorback Ready-Mix Concrete Co., 45 B.R. 917 (Bkrtcy.E.D.Ark.1984). Thus, interest on the pre-petition priority tax claim of the United States is entitled to the same priority status as the tax claim under 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(7). In reaching its holding, the Court specifically overrules its opinion in In re Razorback Ready-Mix Concrete Co., 45 B.R. at 924, as to its prior determination.

This opinion is to be applied prospectively only.

A separate Order in accordance with this opinion will be entered.

1

. Section 507(a)(7) was designated as 507(a)(6) prior to the Bankruptcy Amendments and Federal Judgeship Act of 1984.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Mosbrucker
220 B.R. 656 (D. North Dakota, 1998)
In Re Colortex Industries, Inc.
19 F.3d 1371 (Eleventh Circuit, 1994)
Garcia v. United States
955 F.2d 16 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
Jones v. United States (In re Garcia)
955 F.2d 16 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
In Re Dakota Industries, Inc.
131 B.R. 437 (D. South Dakota, 1991)
United States v. Stowe
121 B.R. 549 (N.D. Indiana, 1990)
In Re Standard Johnson Co., Inc.
90 B.R. 41 (E.D. New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 B.R. 949, 1987 WL 33068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stonecipher-distributors-inc-arwb-1987.