In re Stone

119 F. App'x 557
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 21, 2005
DocketNo. 04-1565
StatusPublished

This text of 119 F. App'x 557 (In re Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Stone, 119 F. App'x 557 (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Tammy M. Stone has filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Stone has failed to demonstrate that she has a clear and indisputable right to mandamus relief. See Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35, 101 S.Ct. 188, 66 L.Ed.2d 193 (1980). Accordingly, although we grant Stone’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.
449 U.S. 33 (Supreme Court, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 F. App'x 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stone-ca4-2005.