In re Stoiber

103 Misc. 654
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedJune 15, 1918
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 103 Misc. 654 (In re Stoiber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Stoiber, 103 Misc. 654 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1918).

Opinion

Ketcham, S.

The will under which this accounting is made is in part as follows:

“ Seventh. I give and bequeath to my wife Lydia, and my son Alwyn, jointly, all my estate, both Beal and Personal, wherever found, all the Stock which my Estate may, own at the time of my death, and in the event of the death of either of them, the bequests or benefits of the one so dying shall cease, and be delivered to the Estate of the survivor.

“ Eighth. In case I survive my wife or son I give all the residuary estate to my executor for the surviving heir. ’ ’

Paragraph seventh contains a specific gift of all the stock of which the testator died possessed. Matter of Franklin Trust Co., 95 Misc. Rep. 71; Matter of Juilliard, 103 id. 178. The opinions in the cases [655]*655cited present numerous authorities in which expressions substantially like that in which the gift here is couched are held to constitute specific legacies.

It results that the stock of the Keller Printing Company belonged to the legatees at once upon death, and could not become subject to the custody or administration of the executor, unless needed to defray debts or expenses of administration. The account shows that no such need arose. The gift of the stock was to two legatees as joint tenants and not as tenants in common or for the life of either. Hence, no security can be required from them upon the delivery of the property. The possession by the executor of this stock is without right, and the same should be delivered to the legatees.

The executor is entitled to commissions upon the personal estate exclusive of the stock, at the valuation stated in the account, and upon the proceeds of sale of the Division avenue real estate. The decree should accord with this opinion.

Decreed accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Huntley v. Commissioner
30 B.T.A. 931 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 Misc. 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stoiber-nysurct-1918.