In re Stirling

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Stirling

787 S.E.2d 497, 416 S.C. 539, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 139

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJune 2, 2016

DocketAppellate Case No. 2016-001157

StatusPublished

This text of 787 S.E.2d 497 (In re Stirling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Stirling, 787 S.E.2d 497, 416 S.C. 539, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 139 (S.C. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel asks this Court to place respondent on incapacity inactive status pursuant to Rule 28 [540]*540of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR). Respondent consents to being transferred to incapacity inactive status.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent is transferred to incapacity inactive status until further order of this Court.

Respondent is hereby enjoined from taking any action regarding any trust, escrow, operating, and any other law office account(s) respondent may maintain at any bank or other financial institution including, but not limited to, making any withdrawal or transfer, or writing any check or other instrument on the account(s).

Within fifteen (15) days of the date of this order, respondent shall serve and file the affidavit required by Rule 30, RLDE. Should respondent fail to timely file the required affidavit, respondent may be held in civil and/or criminal contempt of this Court as provided by Rule 30, RLDE.

s/Costa M. Pleicones, C.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI