In re Stewart

8 Mills Surr. 134, 71 Misc. 640, 130 N.Y.S. 1058
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedApril 15, 1911
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 Mills Surr. 134 (In re Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Stewart, 8 Mills Surr. 134, 71 Misc. 640, 130 N.Y.S. 1058 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1911).

Opinion

Ketcham, S.

There is no warrant for confirmation of a •sale of decedent’s lands for the payment of his debts. Former section 2776 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which required an order confirming the sale, was repealed, in 1904, by the act which reformed the practice relative to the sale of decedent’s lands. Laws of 1904, chap. 750.

It is not possible that a procedure thus deliberately excluded was impliedly preserved by the incidental reference which was unfortunately left in section 2774 of the Code. That section, in like manner, retained the provision that “ a freeholder appointed ’to execute the decree ” should not purchase at the sale, although the statute of 1904 left out the [135]*135express direction, formerly contained in the Code, that a freeholder should be appointed. As well might it be argued that the present statute, by implication and accident, requires or permits the appointment of a freeholder to conduct the sale as that confirmation is required because the word “ confirmation ” escaped the process of revision.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Bridgeport Brass Co.
9 Mills Surr. 319 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Mills Surr. 134, 71 Misc. 640, 130 N.Y.S. 1058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stewart-nysurct-1911.