In Re Stewart J. Guss & Associates, PLLC and Evette Hooper v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Stewart J. Guss & Associates, PLLC and Evette Hooper v. the State of Texas (In Re Stewart J. Guss & Associates, PLLC and Evette Hooper v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued March 26, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00613-CV ——————————— IN RE STEWART J. GUSS & ASSOCIATES, PLLC AND EVETTE HOOPER, Relators
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relators, Stewart J. Guss & Associates, PLLC and Evette Hooper, filed an
“Amended Petition for Writ of Mandamus”1 challenging the trial court’s August 22,
2023 order denying their “Plea to the Jurisdiction, and, in the Alternative, Plea in
1 Relators initially filed a petition for writ of mandamus on August 22, 2023, prior to the trial court issuing an order denying their “Plea to the Jurisdiction, and, in the Alternative, Plea in Abatement.” On September 7, 2023, relators filed an “Amended Petition for Writ of Mandamus,” challenging the trial court’s August 22, 2023 order. Abatement,” in the underlying legal malpractice lawsuit brought by real parties in
interest, Jasleen Minhas, individually and as next friend of M.M. and J.M., minors,
and Dharampal Minhas (collectively, the “real parties”).2 Relators requested that the
“Court grant [their] Petition for Writ of Mandamus, order [the trial court] to vacate
its August 22, 2023 ruling denying [r]elators’ pleas to the jurisdiction and pleas in
abatement, and order [the trial court] to enter an order dismissing or abating [real
parties’] claims.”
Our review of relators’ amended mandamus petition reflects that relators have
failed to establish that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny
relators’ amended petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). All
pending motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Guerra and Farris.
2 The underlying case is Jasleen Minhas, as Next Friend of M.M. and J.M., Minors, and Dharampal Minhas, Cause No. 2022-40947, in 164th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable C. Elliott Thornton presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Stewart J. Guss & Associates, PLLC and Evette Hooper v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stewart-j-guss-associates-pllc-and-evette-hooper-v-the-state-of-texapp-2024.